The easiest thing to do if you don't have a UEFI-bootable Memtest86 ISO is to extract the \EFI\BOOT\BOOTX64.efi file and just copy that to your Ventoy drive. ParagonMounter But when I try to boot it with ventoy it does not boot and says the message "No bootfile found for UEFI". And that is the right thing to do. 2. . I'll test it on a real hardware a bit later. Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community. If you want you can toggle Show all devices option, then all the devices will be in the list. Remove Ventoy secure boot key. Are you using an grub2 External Menu (F6)? I'm getting the same error when booting "Fedora-Workstation-Live-x86_64-33-1.2.iso" or "pop-os_20.04_amd64_intel_8.iso" on either a new ThinkPad X13 or T14s using Ventoy 1.0.31 UEFI. TPM encryption has historically been independent of Secure Boot. Option1: Use current solution(Super UEFIinSecureBoot Disk), then user will be clearly told that, in this case, the secure boot will be by passed. You can have BIOS with TPM and disk encryption and, provided your hardware manufacturer implements anti tampering protection to ensure that the TPM is not sharing data it shouldn't share with parts of the system that should not be trusted, it should be no less secure than TPM-based encryption on a Secure Boot enabled system. I thought that Secure Boot chain of trust is reused for TPM key sealing, but thinking about it more, that wouldn't really work. function gennr(){var n=480678,t=new Date,e=t.getMonth()+1,r=t.getDay(),a=parseFloat("0. I've hacked-up PreLoader once again and managed to cleanly chainload Ubuntu ISO with Secure Boot enabled. You signed in with another tab or window. all give ERROR on my PC Discovery and usage of shim protocol of loaded shim binary for global UEFI validation functions (validation policy override with shim verification), Shim protocol unregistration of loaded shim binary (to prevent confusion among shims of multiple vendors and registration of multiple protocols which are handled by different chainloaded shims). Mybe the image does not support X64 UEFI! Sign in This means current is ARM64 UEFI mode. In other words it will make their system behave as if Secure Boot is disabled, which they are unlikely to expect, else they would have disabled Secure Boot altogether to boot said media (which, if they control that system they can always easily do, especially if it's in a temporary fashion to boot a specific media that they know isn't Secure Boot compliant). MEMZ.img is 4K and Ventoy does not list it in it's menu system. gsrd90 New Member. Maybe the image does not suport IA32 UEFI! Tried the same ISOs in Easy2Boot and they worked for me. So, Ventoy can also adopt that driver and support secure boot officially. Extracting the very same efi file and running that in Ventoy did work! Option 1: Completly by pass the secure boot like the current release. Maybe we should just ask the user 'This file is not signed by Microsoft for 'Secure Boot' - do you still wish to boot from it?' In WIMBOOT mode (ctrl+w) I get 'Loading files. xx%' and then screen resolution changes and get nice Windows Setup GUI. In Ventoy I had enabled Secure Boot and GPT. I can provide an option in ventoy.json for user who want to bypass secure boot. Getting the same error with Arch Linux. I've been trying to do something I've done a milliion times before: This has always worked for me. @ventoy used Super UEFIinSecureBoot Disk files to disable UEFI file policy, that's the easiest way, but not a 'proper' one. In a real use case, when you have several Linux distros (not all of which have Secure Boot support), several unsigned UEFI utilities, it's just easier to temporary disable Secure Boot with SUISBD method. 8 Mb. privacy statement. https://github.com/ventoy/Ventoy/releases/tag/v1.0.33, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F5NFuDCZQ00, http://tinycorelinux.net/13.x/x86_64/release/. Tested on 1.0.77. They all work if I put them onto flash drives directly with Rufus. Shim silently loads any file signed with its embedded key, but shows a signature violation message upon loading another file, asking to enroll its hash or certificate. puedes usar las particiones gpt o mbr. How to Perform a Clean Install of Windows 11. Any progress towards proper secure boot support without using mokmanager? Well occasionally send you account related emails. ElementaryOS boots just fine. FFS I just spent hours reinstalling arch just to get this in the end archlinux-2021.06.01-x86_64.iso with Ventoy 1.0.47 boots for me on Lenovo IdeaPad 300 UEFI64 boot. New version of Rescuezilla (2.4) not working properly. Just some preliminary ideas. I don't know why. @steve6375 Okay thanks. I have used OSFMount to convert the img file of memtest v8 to iso but I have encountered the same issue. And IMO, anything that attempts to push the idea that, maybe, allowing silent boot of unsigned bootloaders is not that bad, is actually doing a major disservice to users, as it does weaken the security of their system and, if this is really what a user wants, they can and should disable Secure Boot. Ventoy is an open source tool that lets you create a bootable USB drive for ISO files. This software will repair common computer errors, protect you from file loss, malware, hardware failure and optimize your PC for maximum performance. If I wasn't aware that Ventoy uses SUISBD, I would be confused just as you by its Secure Boot "support" and lack of information about its consequences. https://abf.openmandriva.org/platforms/cooker/products/4/product_build_lists/3250 Please refer: About Fuzzy Screen When Booting Window/WinPE. Just create a FAT32 partition, change its label to ARCH_YYYYMM (fill in the ISO's date, now it would be ARCH_202109) and extract the Arch ISO to it. PS: It works fine with original ventoy release (use UEFIinSecureBoot) when Secure boot is enabled. Must hardreset the System. 22H2 works on Ventoy 1.0.80. And they can boot well when secure boot is enabled, because they use bootmgr.efi directly from Windows iso. list vol - select vol of EFI (in my case nr 14) as illustrated - assign - EFI drive is mounted as Q: Also possible is: After booting with Win10XPE from RAMDISK the Hidden EFI Driv Else I would have disabled Secure Boot altogether, since the end result it the same. It does not contain efi boot files. Ventoy up to 1.0.12 used the /dev/mapper/ventoy approach to boot. It's a pain in the ass to do yes, but I wouldn't qualify it as very hard. Can it boot ok? Format Ext4 in Linux: sudo mkfs -t ext4 /dev/sdb1 In Windows, some processes will occupy the USB drive, and Ventoy2Disk.exe cannot obtain the control right of the USB drive, so that the device cannot be listed. Tried it yesterday. Can you add the exactly iso file size and test environment information? When user whitelist Venoy that means they trust Ventoy (e.g. It implements the following features: This preloader allows to use Ventoy with proper Secure Boot verification. @pbatard, if that's what what your concern, that could be easily fixed by deleting grubia32.efi and grubx64.efi in /EFI/BOOT, and renaming grubia32_real.efi grubia32.efi, grubx64_real.efi grubx64.efi. If a user whitelists Ventoy using MokManager, it's because they want the Ventoy bootloader to run in a Secure Boot environment and want it to only chain load boot loaders that meet the Secure Boot requirements. It's a bug I introduced with Rescuezilla v2.4. A least, I'd expect that a tutorial that advises a user to modify a JSON file to have done a bit more research into the topic and provide better advice. Background Some of us have bad habits when using USB flash drive and often pull it out directly. Option 2: Only boot .efi file with valid signature. What exactly is the problem? After boot into the Ventoy main menu, pay attention to the lower left corner of the screen: @pbatard I'll fix it. all give ERROR on HP Laptop : As Ventoy itself is not signed with Microsoft key. So all Ventoy's behavior doesn't change the secure boot policy. If someone has physical access to a system then Secure Boot is useless period. Results when tested on different models\types of x86 computers - amount of RAM, make/model, latest BIOS? And, unfortunately, with Ventoy as it stands, this whole trust mechanism is indeed broken, because you can take an official Windows installation ISO, insert a super malicious UEFI bootloader (that performs a Windows installation while also installing malware) and, even if users have Secure Boot enabled (and added Ventoy in Mok manager), they will not be alerted at all that they are running a malicious bootloader, whereas this is the whole point of Secure Boot! if you want can you test this too :) EFI Blocked !!!!!!! You need to make the ISO UEFI64 bootable. chromeos_14816.99.0_reven_recovery_stable-channel_mp-v2.bin fails to boot on BIOS & UEFI. Is there any progress about secure boot support? Ventoy is open-source software that allows users to create ISO, WIM, IMG, VHS(x), and EFI files onto a bootable USB drive. Try updating it and see if that fixes the issue. but CorePure64-13.1.iso does not as it does not contain any EFI boot files. In this situation, with current Ventoy architecture, nothing will boot (even Fedora ISO), because the validation (and loading) files signed with Shim certificate requires support from the bootloader and every chainloaded .efi file (it uses custom protocol, regular EFI functions can't be used. to your account, MB: GA-P110-D3, CPU: Intel Core i5 6400, RAM: 8GB DDR4, GPU: IGFX + NVIDIA GT730, MB: GA-H81M-S2PV, CPU : Intel Core i3 4650, RAM 8GB DDR3 GPU: IGFX, slitaz-rolling-core-5in1.iso There are also third-party tools that can be used to check faulty or fake USB sticks. (The 32 bit images have got the 32 bit UEFI). if it's possible please add UEFI support for this great distro. You can change the type or just delete the partition. XP predated thumbdrives big enough to hold a whole CD image, and indeed widespread use of USB thumb drives in general. If you use the Linux kernel's EFI stub loader or ELILO, you may need to store your kernel on the ESP, so creating an ESP on the large end of the scale is advisable. I used Rufus on a new USB with the same iso image, and when I booted to it with UEFI it booted successfully. I think it's ok as long as they don't break the secure boot policy. I tested Manjaro ISO KDE X64. It seems the original USB drive was bad after all. Then congratulations: You have completely removed any benefits of using Secure Boot for any person who enrolled Ventoy on their Secure Boot computer. And, unless you're going to stand behind every single Ventoy user to explain why you think it shouldn't matter that Ventoy will let any unsigned bootloader through, that's just not going to fly. Format NTFS in Windows: format x: /fs:ntfs /q EndeavourOS_Atlantis_neo-21_5.iso boots OK using UEFI64 on Ventoy and grubfm. 1.0.84 UEFI www.ventoy.net ===> 4. If someone has physical access to a system and that system is enabled to boot from a USB drive, then all they need to do is boot to an OS such as Ubuntu or WindowsPE or WindowsToGo from that USB drive (these OS's are all signed and so will Secure boot). Oh and obviously, once that is done, Ventoy will need to make sure that it's not possible to run an older versions of it, in a Secure Boot environment where a newer version has been enrolled, as it would still defeat the whole thing. Just some of my thoughts: The user could choose to run a Microsoft Windows Install ISO downloaded from the MS servers and Ventoy could inject a malicious file into it as it boots. Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community. cambiar contrasea router nucom; personajes que lucharon por la igualdad de gnero; playa de arena rosa en bahamas; Have a question about this project? Therefore, Ventoy/Grub should be altered as follows: Hopefully this shouldn't be too complex to add, though it may require some research, and modifying GRUB to do just that might require a lot of work. I suspect that, even as we are not there yet, this is something that we're eventually going to see (but most likely as a choice for the user to install the fully secured or partially secured version of the OS), culminating in OSes where every single binary that runs needs to be signed, and for the certificates those binaries are signed with to be in the chain of trust of OS. Then your life is simplified to Persistence management while each of the 2 (Ventoy or SG2D) provide the ability to boot Windows if it is installed on any local . In a fit of desperation, I tried another USB drive - this one 64GB instead of 8GB. For example, Ventoy can be modified to somehow chainload full chain of distros shim grub kernel, or custom validation functions could be made, which would, for example, validate and accept files signed with certificates in DB + a set of custom certificates (like ones embedded in distros' Shims), or even validate and automatically extract Shims embedded certificates and override EFI validation functions (as it's done currently to completely disable validation), but is this kind of complexity worth it for a USB boot utility which is implemented to be simple and convenient? ISO file name (full exact name) Secure Boot was supported from Ventoy 1.0.07, but the solution is not perfect enough. You can put a file with name .ventoyignore in the specific directory. For instance, if you produce digitally signed software for Windows, to ensure that your users can validate that when they run an application, they can tell with certainty whether it comes from you or not, you really don't want someone to install software on the user computer that will suddenly make applications that weren't signed by you look as if they were signed by you. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F5NFuDCZQ00 I will test it in a realmachine later. Now, if Microsoft finally relinquished their abusive policy about not accepting GPLv3 code for Secure Boot signing and Ventoy was updated not to allow unsigned bootloaders when Secure Boot is enabled (i.e. Legacy\UEFI32\UEFI64 boot? I'm aware that Super GRUB2 Disk's author tried to handle that, I'll ask him for comments. Ventoy version and details of options chosen when making it (Legacy\MBR\reserved space) The BIOS decides to boot Ventoy in Legacy BIOS mode or in UEFI mode. But MediCat USB is already open-source, built upon the open-source Ventoy project. see http://tinycorelinux.net/13.x/x86_64/release/ I have installed Ventoy on my USB and I have added ISO file: "Win10SupperLite_TeamOS_Edition.iso" Hi, HDClone can be booted by Ventoy in Memdisk mode for legacy BIOS, you try Ventoy 1.0.08 beta2. Some bioses have a bug. MediCAT Fedora-Workstation-Live-x86_64-32-1.6.iso: Works fine, all hard drive can be properly detected. Nevertheless, thanks for the explanation, it cleared up some things for me around the threat model of Secure Boot. Latest Laptop UEFI 64+SECURE BOOT ON Blocked message. Users enabled Secure Boot to be warned if a boot loader fails Secure Boot validation, regardless of where that bootloader is executed from. How to make sure that only valid .efi file can be loaded. privacy statement. Not exactly. What you want is for users to be alerted if someone picked a Linux or Microsoft media, and the UEFI bootloader was altered from the original. same here on ThinkPad x13 as for @rderooy 3. Already on GitHub? They can't eliminate them totally, but they can provide an additional level of protection. The thing is, the Windows injection that Ventoy usse can be applied to an extracted ISO (i.e. I tested it but trying to boot it will fail with an I/O error. Any kind of solution? WinPE10_8_Sergei_Strelec_x86_x64_2019.12.28_English.iso BOOT but Custom launcher cannot open custom path and unable access to special apps. Error description access with key cards) making sure that your safe does get installed there, so that it should give you an extra chance to detect ill intentioned people trying to access its content. E2B and grubfm\agFM legacy mode work OK in their default modes. I adsime that file-roller is not preserving boot parameters, use another iso creation tool. 2There are two methods: Enroll Key and Enroll Hash, use whichever one. You are receiving this because you commented. Ubuntu.iso). For more information on how to download and install Ventoy on Windows 10/11, we have a guide for that. Many thousands of people use Ventoy, the website has a list of tested ISOs. Go ahead and download Rufus from here. Maybe the image does not support X64 UEFI" Firstly, I run into the MOKManager screen and enroll the testkey-ventoy.der and reboot. Option 3: only run .efi file with valid signature. To create a USB stick that is compatible with USB 3.0 using the native boot experience of the Windows 10 Technical Preview media (or Windows 8/Windows 8.1), use DiskPart to format the USB stick and set the partition to active, then copy all of the files from inside the ISO . Please thoroughly test the archive and give your feedback, what works and what don't. Yes. Its also a bit faster than openbsd, at least from my experience. Extra Ventoy hotkey features: F1 or 1 - load the payoad file into memory first (useful for some small DOS and Linx ISOs). In other words, that there might exist other software that might be used to force the door open is irrelevant. The iso image (prior to modification) works perfectly, and boots using Ventoy. All the .efi/kernel/drivers are not modified. Don't get me wrong, I understand your concerns and support your position. If you get some error screen instead of the above blue screen (for example, Linpus lite xxxx). preloader-for-ventoy-prerelease-1.0.40.zip FreeBSD 13.1-RELEASE Aarch64 fails to boot saying "No bootfile found for UEFI!". How did you get it to be listed by Ventoy? That's actually the whole reason shims exist, because Microsoft forbade Linux people to get their most common UEFI boot manager signed for Secure Boot, so the Linux community was forced into creating a separate non GPLv3 boot loader that loads GRUB, and that can be signed for Secure Boot. I've been studying doing something like that for UEFI:NTFS in case Microsoft rlinquishes their stupid "no GPLv3" policy on Secure Boot signing, and I don't see it as that difficult when there are UEFI APIs you can rely on to do the 4 steps I highlighted. However the solution is not perfect enough. You answer my questions and then I will answer yours MEMZ.img was listed with no changes for me. So the new ISO file can be booted fine in a secure boot enviroment. The virtual machine cannot boot. and windows password recovery BootCD 2.-verificar que la arquitectura de la imagen iso sea compatible con el procesador, 1.-modo uefi: 3. *lil' bow* It is pointless to try to enforce Secure Boot from a USB drive. It . Because if I know you ever used Ventoy in a Secure Boot enabled environment, I can now run any malicious payload I want at the UEFI level, on your computer. Besides, you can try a linux iso file, for example ubuntu-20.04-desktop-amd64.iso, I have the same for Memtest86-4.3.7.iso and ipxe.iso but works fine with netboot.xyz-efi.iso (v2.0.17), manjaro-gnome-20.0.3-200606-linux56.iso, Windows10_PLx64_2004.iso and HBCD_PE_x64.iso (v1.0.1) Lenovo Ideapad Z580. privacy statement. You need to create a directory with name ventoy and put ventoy.json in this directory(that is \ventoy\ventoy.json). Ventoy virtualizes the ISO as a cdrom device and boot it. Indeed I have erroneously downloaded memtest v4 because I just read ".iso" and went for it. I think it's OK. I don't remember if the shortcut is ctrl i or ctrl r for grub mode. You can grab latest ISO files here : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-mv6Cbew_y8&t=1m13s. Yes. Ventoy Version 1.0.78 What about latest release Yes. "No bootfile found for UEFI! If anyone has an issue - please state full and accurate details. This means current is 32bit UEFI mode. The MEMZ virus nyan cat as an image file produces a very weird result, It also happens when running Ventoy in QEMU, The MEMZ virus nyan cat as an image file produces a very weird result Adding an efi boot file to the directory does not make an iso uefi-bootable. There are many other applications that can create bootable disks but Ventoy comes with its sets of features. In Windows, Ventoy2Disk.exe will only list the device removable and in USB interface type by default. https://drive.google.com/file/d/1_mYChRFanLEdyttDvT-cn6zH0o6KX7Th/view, https://www.mediafire.com/file/5zui8pq5p0p9zug/Windows10_SuperLite_TeamOS_Edition.iso/file, [issue]: Can't boot Ventoy UEFI Native (Without CSM) on HP ProBook 640g1. There are two bugs in Ventoy: Unsigned bootloader Linux ISOs or ISOs without UEFI support does not boot with Secure Boot enabled. I've made another patched preloader with Secure Boot support. Only in 2019 the signature validation was enforced. to your account, Hi ! Also tested on Lenovo IdeaPad 300 16GB OK (UEFI64). Especially, UEFI:NTFS is not a SHIM, and I don't maintain a set of signatures that I allow binaries signed with through. Maybe the image does not support X64 UEFI! For example, GRUB 2 is licensed under GPLv3 and will not be signed. So maybe Ventoy also need a shim as fedora/ubuntu does. Select "Partition scheme" as MBR (Master Boot Record) and "File system" as NTFS. @ventoy, I've tested it only in qemu and it worked fine. You literally move files around and use a text editor to edit theme.text, ventoy.json, and so on. The main annoyance in my view is that it requires 2 points of contact for security updates (per https://github.com/rhboot/shim-review) and that I have some doubts that Microsoft will allow anything but a formal organization with more than a couple of people to become a SHIM provider. However what currently happens is that people who do have Secure Boot enabled will currently not be alerted to these at all. After the reboot, select Delete MOK and click Continue. Users may run into issues with Ventoy not working because of corrupt ISO files, which will create problems when booting an image file. I can only see the UEFI option in my BIOS, even thought I have CSM (Legacy Compatibility) enabled. 1.0.84 MIPS www.ventoy.net ===> Option 1: doesn't support secure boot at all I'm hoping other people can test and report because it will most likely be a few weeks before this can make it to the top of my priority list @ventoy, are you interested in a proper implementation of Secure Boot support? But even the user answer "YES, I don't care, just boot it." 1. Win10_21H2_BrazilianPortuguese_x64.iso also boots fine in Legacy mode on IdeaPad 300 with Ventoy 1.0.57. This completely defeats Secure Boot and should not happen, as the only EFI bootloader that should be whitelisted for Secure Boot should be Ventoy itself, and any other EFI bootloader should still be required to pass Secure Boot validation. @pbatard, have you tested it? I am not using a grub external menu. This was not considered Secure Boot violation as ExitBootServices() was called prior to booting the kernel. I am just resuming my work on it. when the user Secure Boots via MokManager - even when booting signed efi files of Ubuntu or Windows? Ventoy will search all the directories and sub directories recursively to find all the iso files and list them in the boot menu. 04-23-2021 02:00 PM. 2. Most likely it was caused by the lack of USB 3.0 driver in the ISO. Acronis True Image 2020 24.6.1 Build 25700 in Legacy is working in Memdisk mode on 1.0.08 beta 2 but on another older Version of Acronis 2020 sometimes is boot's up but the most of the time he's crashing after loading acronis loader text. It was working for hours before finally failing with a non-specific error. And of course, by the same logic, anything unsigned should not boot when Secure Boot is active. If you really want to mount it, you can use the experimental option VTOY_LINUX_REMOUNT in Global Control Plugin. Thnx again. I remember that @adrian15 tried to create a sets of fully trusted chainload chains However, I guess it should be possible to automatically enroll ALL needed keys to shim from grub module on the first boot (when the user enrolls my ENROLL_THIS_CERT_INTO_MOKMANAGER.crt) and handle unsigned efi binaries as a special case or just require to sign them with user-generated key? I was just objecting to your claim that Secure Boot is useless when someone has physical access to the device, which I don't think is true, as it is still (afaik) required for TPM-based encryption to work correctly. There are many kinds of WinPE. Hello , Thank you very very much for your testings and reports. Secure Boot is tricky to deal with and can (rightfully) be seen as a major inconvenience instead of yet another usually desireable line of defence against malware (but by all means not a panacea). I have this same problem. KANOTIX uses a hybrid ISO layout, it definitely has X64 UEFI in ISO9660 and FAT12 (usually 1MiB offset). This is definitely what you want. @rderooy try to use newest version, I've been trying on a Dell XPS 13 9360 with Ventoy 1.0.34 UEFI running and Memtest86-4.3.7.iso does not work. @DocAciD I don't have a Lenovo, ThinkPad or a ThinkCentre, Getting the same on TinyCoreLiInux (CorePlus), URL; http://tinycorelinux.net/downloads.html, The ISO must be UEFI-bootable and have a UEFI64 boot file \EFI\BOOT\BOOTX64.EFI Maybe the image does not support X64 UEFI! This ISO file doesn't change the secure boot policy. BIOS Mode Both Partition Style GPT Disk . We talk about secure boot, not secure system. https://osdn.net/projects/manjaro/storage/kde/, manjaro-kde-20.0-rc3-200422-linux56.iso BOOT Now there's no need to format the disk again and again or to extract anything-- with Ventoy simply copy the ISO file to the USB drive and boot it. You can install Ventoy to USB drive, Removable HD, SD Card, SATA HDD, SSD, NVMe . Intel Sunrise Point-LP, Intel Kaby Lake-R, @chromer030 Your favorite, APorteus was done with legacy & UEFI Ventoy's boot menu is not shown but with the following grub shell. This same image I boot regularly on VMware UEFI. @adrian15, could you tell us your progress on this? https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub2/+bug/1401532. Shims and other Secure Boot signed chain loaders do not remove the feature of warning about boot loaders that have not been signed (by either MS or the Shim holders). The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: Please give the exact iso file name. That is to say, a WinPE.iso or ubuntu.iso file can be booted fine with secure boot enabled(even no need for the user to whitelist them) but it may contain a malicious application in it. On the other hand, the expectation is that most users would only get the warning very occasionally, and you definitely want to bring to their attention that they might want to be careful about the current bootloader they are trying to boot, in case they haven't paid that much attention to where they got their image @ventoy, @pbatard, any comments on my solution? In the install program Ventoy2Disk.exe. That's because, if they did want to boot non Secure Boot enabled ones, they would disable Secure Boot themselves. Although it could be disabled on all typical motherboards in UEFI setup menu, sometimes it's not easily possible e.g.