>> /P 12 0 R /Tabs /S /S /P << /Lang (EN-US) 304 0 obj /CropBox [0 0 612 792] Despite the Attorney General's best attempts to cast himself a super- /P 528 0 R /S /P /Lang (EN-US) >> >> >> endobj /Lang (EN-US) >> Make certain each and every area has been filled in properly. /K 1 241 0 obj endobj /Lang (EN-US) 75 0 obj 61 0 obj /Lang (EN-US) endobj /Kids [35 0 R 36 0 R 37 0 R 38 0 R 39 0 R] /Pg 15 0 R /K [500 0 R 501 0 R 502 0 R] /Kids [6 0 R 7 0 R 8 0 R 9 0 R 10 0 R 11 0 R] 192 0 obj /K 4 >> /Annots [] /MediaBox [0 0 612 792] /Lang (EN-US) >> endobj at 390-91. endobj /Filter /FlateDecode 268 0 obj 166 0 obj endobj Ct., 719 P.2d 699, 704 (Colo. 1986). /S /H1 /StructParents 16 These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia. /Lang (EN-US) 184 0 obj 17 0 obj /Pg 20 0 R >> /S /P (quoting People ex rel. /S /P to the subject matter of this litigation. /S /P /Pg 45 0 R 95 0 obj /CropBox [0 0 612 792] endobj << The government does not contest the fact that prosecutors Mark Rosman and Karen Sharp met with the defendant on June 21, 1995, and that the defendant was offered immunity, which he declined to accept. /K 17 _______________/s/_______________ MARK R. ROSMAN Attorney-in-Charge Florida State Bar No. endobj /P 505 0 R /Lang (EN-US) /P 508 0 R 341 0 obj 211 0 obj << The Motion Clerk shall enter the "Answer" or "Response" Date on the Cover Sheet. endobj << /Pg 22 0 R Defendants' Motion to Disqualify Plaintiff's counsel, Greenberg Traurig, LLP ("GT") is a baseless effort to divert the Court from the merits of the controversy between the parties, in which GT's client has already been shown to have been seriously wronged by the moving parties. endobj /Pg 27 0 R >> /Pg 19 0 R /K [34 291 0 R 36] /K 9 263 0 obj >> /Resources 432 0 R /Contents [495 0 R 496 0 R 497 0 R] /Count 5 /S /P endobj Motions to disqualify counsel are orchestrated for two primary reasons: Either an attorney or law firm have been unduly abusive or they have been so effective in defending or prosecuting a case. endobj 199 0 obj /Pg 45 0 R . [18 -1] at 19. /Pg 29 0 R /K 6 /Pg 19 0 R << /Lang (EN-US) /P 12 0 R /Subscript /Span /P 12 0 R << 41 0 obj /Lang (EN-US) >> /K 0 8 0 obj << 137 0 obj /P 133 0 R The State filed a response to the motion, see id. >> 196 0 obj endobj >> 349 0 obj << /K [14 523 0 R] 273 0 obj >> endobj /Tabs /S /S /P Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites. /Pg 44 0 R /Pg 31 0 R >> 324 0 obj General Use: Description. /P 12 0 R 6. /S /P /S /P /Pg 15 0 R 602. endobj /P 12 0 R >> /P 12 0 R >> >> /K 1 We are hired both to file and pursue disqualification, and to represent lawyers in resisting disqualification. << << << /K 1 endobj /S /P >> >> 157 0 R 158 0 R 159 0 R 160 0 R 161 0 R 162 0 R 163 0 R 164 0 R 165 0 R 166 0 R endobj /Lang (EN-US) endobj << >> /Pg 31 0 R 337 0 R 338 0 R 339 0 R 340 0 R 341 0 R 342 0 R 343 0 R 344 0 R] /K 7 /P 12 0 R /S /Reference /K 13 /Pg 45 0 R endobj >> /K 31 /K 2 The Motion was filed by Michael R. Presley, Esq. /Resources 387 0 R /Annots [] /P 12 0 R /Pg 40 0 R /K 31 For the reasons that follow, the two motions to disqualify are denied, and the motion to strike is granted in part and denied in part. endobj /Lang (EN-US) As noted, this order addresses . /S /P << << >> /Annots [] 165 0 obj RESPONSE TO SOME SPECIFIC CLAIMS OF IMPROPRIETY IN THE MOTION TO DISQUALIFY (1) THE CLAIM: Special Counsel breached confidentiality by allowing a DMS employee to be present for sworn testimony of numerous witnesses. /P 280 0 R /Pg 27 0 R endobj << << >> 0000006382 00000 n /Pg 44 0 R 0000008829 00000 n /K 14 the entire judicial process' when deciding a motion to disqualify an attorney pursuant to K.R.P.C. The attorney may know the clients bottom line for settlement or how the client prefers to approach litigation. /Parent 8 0 R In Sacramento, the . /Diagram /Figure /Pg 45 0 R << endobj People v. Nozolino, 298 P.3d 915, 919 (Colo. 2013) (Disqualification of a partys chosen attorney is an extreme remedy and is only appropriate where required to preserve the integrity and fairness of the judicial proceedings.) (citation omitted). << /Pg 16 0 R 350 0 obj Legal Ethics 71, 77 (Winter 2014). /S /P /Lang (EN-US) /Pg 17 0 R endobj /Pg 45 0 R See Swisher, The Practice and Theory of Lawyer Disqualification, 27 Geo. /S /P /P 12 0 R << /Lang (EN-US) /K 9 256 0 obj /K 6 /S /P An important requirement contained in rule 2.160 (e) is that a disqualification motion must be made within 10 days after the "discovery of the facts constituting the grounds" for the motion. >> >> /S /P endobj /Lang (EN-US) 167 0 obj /Lang (EN-US) /CropBox [0 0 612 792] >> /K 55 >> /Lang (EN-US) 78 0 obj << endobj endobj /P 12 0 R /Resources 440 0 R /P 55 0 R 298 0 R 299 0 R 298 0 R null 300 0 R 301 0 R 300 0 R null 302 0 R 303 0 R /P 12 0 R /Lang (EN-US) 137 0 R 138 0 R 139 0 R 140 0 R 141 0 R 142 0 R 143 0 R 144 0 R 145 0 R 146 0 R >> /K 12 /S /Footnote /MarkInfo 2 0 R /P 12 0 R The Texas Supreme Court held that disqualification was proper, reasoning /MediaBox [0 0 612 792] /P 508 0 R 131 0 obj /Tabs /S /S /P /MediaBox [0 0 612 792] 13 [118 0 R 119 0 R 120 0 R 121 0 R 122 0 R] /Contents [459 0 R 460 0 R 461 0 R] endobj >> endobj >> endobj /S /Link >> /P 12 0 R /K 59 /K 4 /P 12 0 R endobj ,"w0:IYbJ!`.^OtX]8Xhyi(< 1+!)CafX>2p1D0UXrA!iP2j\ << endobj /S /P >> Notice of Motion and Motion. << /Lang (EN-US) /Pg 45 0 R /P 12 0 R 87 0 obj /Lang (EN-US) /Lang (EN-US) 329 0 obj endobj << /Pg 25 0 R /P 12 0 R /K 3 /P 310 0 R 258 0 obj /Tabs /S /P 12 0 R /K 14 People v. Harlan, 54 P.3d 871, 877 (Colo. 2002). /P 12 0 R /K 3 /Pg 17 0 R Significantly, the increasing mobility of lateral attorneys (with attorneys rarely spending their entire legal careers at a single law practice or firm) has raised issues that can serve as the basis of a motion to disqualify. /Tabs /S 52 0 obj endobj HarrisT19@michigan.gov . /Contents [471 0 R 472 0 R 473 0 R] /Pg 19 0 R /K [10 527 0 R] /Lang (EN-US) /S /P /K 3 /Pg 19 0 R endobj /Pg 17 0 R /P 506 0 R << endobj /StructParents 30 /K 23 /Pg 16 0 R /Pg 21 0 R >> 21 0 obj /Pg 15 0 R /Lang (EN-US) /S /P Myers v. Porter (In re Estate of Myers), 130 P.3d 1023, 1025 (Colo. 2006). 0000003370 00000 n endobj /Rotate 0 332 0 obj Conflict violations are not always the focal point for resolution of a motion to disqualify. /K 2 /P 508 0 R /Pg 17 0 R endobj 185 0 obj endobj >> /K 14 >> /Pg 44 0 R /S /Reference Rule 4-1.6 provides that, except in limited circumstances, "a lawyer shall not reveal information relating to representation of a client. /K 3 endobj /Lang (EN-US) endobj /K 1 /Lang (EN-US) /Pg 38 0 R 20 [142 0 R 143 0 R] >> << 254 0 obj 32 0 obj /K 29 /Marked true /Pg 37 0 R 235 0 obj /P 508 0 R /CropBox [0 0 612 792] /K [304 0 R 306 0 R 308 0 R 310 0 R 312 0 R] 147 0 R 148 0 R 149 0 R 150 0 R 151 0 R 152 0 R 153 0 R 154 0 R 155 0 R 156 0 R ECF No. /Contents [491 0 R 492 0 R 493 0 R] /Annots [] /S /P /Lang (EN-US) /S /TOCI Visit the Civil General Use forms page.. Self-Help Resources Formularios en Espaol. 72 0 obj An official website of the United States government. >> /P 12 0 R /Lang (EN-US) >> /S /P /S /P endobj >> /Pg 16 0 R /P 12 0 R >> >> /Pg 28 0 R /Rotate 0 /Lang (EN-US) 236 0 obj /Rotate 0 /Type /Pages /Lang (EN-US) endobj << /P 530 0 R /K 42 endobj 288 0 R 289 0 R 288 0 R null 290 0 R 291 0 R 290 0 R null 292 0 R 293 0 R /StructParents 1 /P 12 0 R /P 506 0 R << /S /P /Lang (EN-US) /Lang (EN-US) /dc43kgm@9{Q CF";dlx23H(k)+BH0s0~SxDmSKfy~x|}w"l'%%o2nrQr>VKwLB3=_KJgZ%'$(":xPU.m99(+'&{Mj4k%'5CS@w7)05eX G?A*hR'*X\r^nDb'OAWMRd.ZEOp:|ECldHP?=[U'UjdW'f}\&D]J}r). endobj >> >> << ; Utica Mut. /Lang (EN-US) 117 0 R 118 0 R 119 0 R 120 0 R 121 0 R 122 0 R 123 0 R 124 0 R 125 0 R 126 0 R 109 0 obj /Lang (EN-US) /Resources 482 0 R /Lang (EN-US) /P 12 0 R 0000006483 00000 n 0000002515 00000 n 15 316 0 R 16 [127 0 R 128 0 R 129 0 R 130 0 R 131 0 R] /Pg 17 0 R /P 12 0 R endobj >> 305 0 obj /Rotate 0 Additionally, the motion must be "promptly presented" to the trial court for "immediate ruling." Id. 0000002183 00000 n endobj /Lang (EN-US) << << /Lang (EN-US) /Lang (EN-US) /StructParents 0 endobj /S /P /P 12 0 R /CropBox [0 0 612 792] /CropBox [0 0 612 792] /Type /Catalog /TextBox /Art 276 0 obj When a party wants to ask an Administrative Law Judge, or "ALJ," to do or change something about their case, it is called a "motion." Examples are requesting that a date for mediation be scheduled or that two cases be combined into one hearing (called a "consolidation"). /Pg 16 0 R /Pg 16 0 R /Pg 19 0 R /S /P 219 0 R 220 0 R 221 0 R 222 0 R 223 0 R 224 0 R 225 0 R 226 0 R 227 0 R 228 0 R /S /P 249 0 obj Attorney General . /K 0 /S /P /Lang (EN-US) 67 0 R 68 0 R 69 0 R 70 0 R 71 0 R 72 0 R 73 0 R 74 0 R 75 0 R 76 0 R /P 506 0 R endobj /Tabs /S /K 13 Defendants Response to Motion to Disqualify Defendants Counsel /Pg 17 0 R /Lang (EN-US) /K 21 The defendant may not call the prosecutors as witnesses unless there is a compelling need to do so. /P 506 0 R 124 0 obj 10 filed 06/26/19 PageID.515 Page 2 of 32 63 0 obj /P 12 0 R /K 9 /K 0 /StructParents 14 endobj /Pg 29 0 R /P 12 0 R >> Id. /S /P >> endobj /K 20 /P 505 0 R /Pg 17 0 R The instant motion was filed eleven days after all the testimony had been taken and five days after the judge had announced his ruling. /S /P endobj 197 0 obj >> /P 12 0 R /K 4 >> << >> /Type /Page /S /P /Lang (EN-US) /S /TOC 24 0 obj endobj /K [274 0 R 276 0 R 278 0 R 280 0 R 282 0 R 284 0 R 286 0 R 288 0 R 290 0 R 292 0 R << /Resources 498 0 R Id. /P 505 0 R << << /Lang (EN-US) endobj 91 0 obj /StructParents 11 /S /P /P 12 0 R << << 438 0 obj /Pg 15 0 R << /MediaBox [0 0 612 792] /K 12 This written response must be filed within two days after the motion to disqualify was . /Pg 23 0 R This is often referred to as playbook knowledgethe attorney knows the clients paths and approaches. /Pg 17 0 R /StructParents 19 /P 531 0 R /K 5 >> endobj << The far more common motion to disqualify involves a former client, either of the law firm or of an individual attorney (who may have recently joined the firm). << { 10} On July 11, 2006, the trial court ordered Bikkani to provide the discovery responses, including signed authorizations to release medical records, and notified 114 0 obj << /P 506 0 R << << /Pg 45 0 R /K 1 <<329FC6C22BACB2110A0030BBE330FF7F>]/Prev 482690>> Mr. 357 0 obj /P 529 0 R /Lang (EN-US) 66 0 obj endobj /Lang (EN-US) /Type /Page /P 55 0 R 179 0 obj /P 506 0 R /Pg 16 0 R /Pg 16 0 R >> My name is Adam C. Sloane. /Type /Page 319 0 obj /Lang (EN-US) endobj Colo. RPC 1.9 does not define a substantially related matter,. 290 0 obj /Lang (EN-US) In 3/19, C.H. /Tabs /S endobj /Lang (EN-US) endobj /P 505 0 R 1990); United States v. Brothers, 856 F. Supp. endobj 74 0 obj 309 0 R 308 0 R null 310 0 R 311 0 R 310 0 R null 312 0 R null 57 0 R] /S /Link 355 0 obj >> /Lang (EN-US) /K [30 289 0 R 32] /Contents [408 0 R 409 0 R 410 0 R] /Pg 20 0 R endobj 116 0 obj endobj /K [6 277 0 R 8] 284 0 obj 295 0 obj endobj /P 12 0 R /Lang (EN-US) endobj /Rotate 0 citation to the law supporting the request. The conflict is imputed to everyone in the law firm, and most certainly the firm will require more than one week to respond to the motion to disqualify. endobj 212 0 obj /Type /Page << /Pg 41 0 R /Rotate 0 /Lang (EN-US) >> /Parent 6 0 R /Lang (EN-US) /Contents [404 0 R 405 0 R 406 0 R] /K 15 << /K 11 /Lang (EN-US) /S /P 53 0 obj However, disqualification is a harsh measure. Under the Colorado Rules of Professional Conduct (Colorado Rules or Colo. RCP), an attorney must safeguard client confidences and secrets, subject to a few exceptions.2 The attorney is also obligated to elevate the clients interests above the interests of the attorney and the law firm. << 2014-1675 (Fed.Cir. /Lang (EN-US) << /K 15 /P 12 0 R /S /P /Type /Page /S /P /Contents [445 0 R 446 0 R 447 0 R] /CropBox [0 0 612 792] /Pg 15 0 R >> /P 56 0 R /S /P /Contents [400 0 R 401 0 R 402 0 R] /P 505 0 R 170 0 obj /P 509 0 R 0000001860 00000 n /Lang (EN-US) /Pg 17 0 R /S /Reference /P 12 0 R endobj /Lang (EN-US) /Annots [] << 35 [192 0 R 193 0 R 194 0 R 195 0 R 196 0 R 197 0 R 198 0 R 199 0 R 200 0 R 201 0 R Upon consideration of the defendant's Motion to Disqualify Prosecutors Mark R. Rosman and Karen J. /S /P /Lang (EN-US) << /Lang (EN-US) hbbd```b``@$Xd &`L CDrA@q/^b{ kjUA$&HK9tI $ N /Type /Page /P 528 0 R >> /StructParents 32 /RoleMap 14 0 R /S /P /Parent 9 0 R /S /H3 /S /P /P 290 0 R /Pg 42 0 R 2 [54 0 R null 274 0 R 275 0 R 274 0 R null 276 0 R 277 0 R 276 0 R null >> >> /Lang (EN-US) /Tabs /S /S /P endobj endobj 34 [345 0 R 346 0 R 347 0 R 348 0 R 349 0 R 350 0 R 351 0 R 352 0 R 353 0 R 354 0 R /S /P 76 0 obj >> /K [8 525 0 R] >> /P 300 0 R << << /K 30 /K 2 endobj /Resources 444 0 R /Resources 418 0 R /Lang (EN-US) /S /TOCI /Resources 379 0 R /Lang (EN-US) /K 1 5. Therefore, the defendant's Motion to Disqualify the prosecutors should be denied. endobj /InlineShape /Figure /S /P /K 19 endobj Almost five years later, the Wife's former counsel filed a notice of appearance, and on December 29, 2016, almost seven years after the initial motion was filed, the Wife filed a "renewed motion to disqualify." The 2016 motion alleged not only that the Husband's attorney prepared the agreement and would be a endobj << /Lang (EN-US) /P 508 0 R /S /P /P 12 0 R 300 0 obj The defendant has failed to demonstrate a compelling need to call the prosecutors as witnesses in this case. /Lang (EN-US) endobj /P 12 0 R 17 [132 0 R 134 0 R 135 0 R 136 0 R 137 0 R null 322 0 R 323 0 R 322 0 R null /K 4 << 15 0 obj /P 12 0 R /StructParents 4 /Lang (EN-US) 127 0 obj /S /Footnote /StructParents 8 White, Dunn & Booker 1200 First Alabama Bank Building Birmingham, AL 32503, Albert C. Bowen, Esq. >> /Type /Page 56 0 obj /S /P << /Lang (EN-US) the matters involved in both representations are substantially related, and. /Lang (EN-US) 244 0 obj 138 0 obj /Lang (EN-US) /Lang (EN-US) 306 0 obj << /MediaBox [0 0 612 792] >> endobj /P 12 0 R /P 508 0 R /Parent 3 0 R /S /Reference /Pg 16 0 R endobj /K 1 /S /Table /K 32 endobj endobj /Lang (EN-US) >> /P 12 0 R /K 2 THE RESPONSE: The employee in question was Matthew Minno, who is a staff attorney with DMS. /Lang (EN-US) << See Alps Prop., 526 F. Supp. /Type /Pages 356 0 obj << /S /H3 128 0 obj endobj >> << In fact, the plaintiff's attorney conceded in open court, "I can honestly state I am not completely pre-pared to respond to the motion for summa-ry judgment." The judge, however, allowed the plaintiff to submit a brief on the . 16.23(c) to the U.S. Department of Justice for the testimony of Mark Rosman and Karen Sharp. /S /P << /Lang (EN-US) endobj 103 0 obj /Pg 16 0 R After this hearing, M retained counsel (C.H.). >> /Pg 18 0 R << /Lang (EN-US) << /Pg 16 0 R The facts stated in Mrs. Landes' Response to the Motion to Disqualify, are true and correct, including the fact that I do not have Mr. Cuzdey's client file. /P 124 0 R /K 1 The trial judge observed the motion for recusal was likely a dilatory tactic. endobj /Lang (EN-US) >> 438 30 /P 162 0 R /CropBox [0 0 612 792] /Pg 46 0 R The defendant asserts that the prosecutors are material witnesses in this case because they "have personal knowledge of material, exculpatory information which is crucial to the defense." /Pg 19 0 R << endobj /P 12 0 R >> << /Annots [] /Count 5 /Lang (EN-US) 23 [152 0 R 153 0 R 154 0 R 155 0 R] /Type /Page /Pg 18 0 R << >> << 68 0 obj 320 0 obj /P 531 0 R >> /P 505 0 R See People v. Perez, 201 P.3d 1220, 1246 n.11 (Colo. 2009). >> << endobj /K [9 309 0 R 11] 321 0 obj /A 524 0 R /Parent 3 0 R << /S /TOCI endobj /K 2 >> /Rotate 0 /Pg 44 0 R /P 531 0 R /Pg 19 0 R 48 0 obj /P 528 0 R /Contents [368 0 R 369 0 R 370 0 R] >> /S /P 142 0 obj /Rotate 0 253 0 R 254 0 R 255 0 R 256 0 R 257 0 R 258 0 R 259 0 R 260 0 R 261 0 R 262 0 R 263 0 R 264 0 R 265 0 R 266 0 R 267 0 R 268 0 R 269 0 R 270 0 R 271 0 R 272 0 R /Lang (EN-US) Subscribe to Justia's Free Newsletters featuring summaries of federal and state court opinions. /ParentTree 13 0 R /Type /Page /Pg 23 0 R /Lang (EN-US) /S /P 83 0 obj /K 4 /Pg 35 0 R /Parent 11 0 R /Pg 16 0 R /S /P E.g., Celgard, LLC v. LG Chem., Ltd, No. /K [4 316 0 R 6] << /Lang (EN-US) /K 18 /P 509 0 R endobj ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion to Disqualify is GRANTED and Andrew J. Cevasco, Esquire is disqualified pursuant to New Jersey Rule of Professional Conduct 3.7 from serving as legal counsel for the Defendants at the trial in this matter; and IT IS FURTHER ORDERED pursuant to R. 1:5-1(a) that a copy of this Order will be 14 [123 0 R 125 0 R 126 0 R null 315 0 R 316 0 R 315 0 R null 317 0 R null /Lang (EN-US) 186 0 obj >> `%qs2"Z(-> ^eZAst`zqz~5{=rvvl6r7rhi_WSztQa%_`e.~QFCPN!Px:v7Pp}VDl|RUjND,a5KFVo}W4+7H/)fJ%o5mgS9BFcQ7HP13+Fxk{N25 wx7O)&[ /iCw %Fk|7on6 r9rH_wFS&`E9T8`jPDlm(n /S /P /Pg 26 0 R 167 0 R 168 0 R 169 0 R 170 0 R 171 0 R 172 0 R 173 0 R 174 0 R 175 0 R 176 0 R /P 12 0 R 0 /S /P 282 0 obj /Lang (EN-US) >> endobj << /Pg 15 0 R /Parent 8 0 R << . /S /P specifies the date, time, and location where the hearing will take place, spells out what the party is requesting, and gives a . /Lang (EN-US) /Pg 18 0 R >> /S /P endobj << << Rodriguez v. Dist. /Lang (EN-US) endobj 0000009036 00000 n 362 0 obj /P 298 0 R Co. of Wausau, No. 326 0 obj /S /P /Annots [423 0 R 424 0 R] /S /P /MediaBox [0 0 612 792] /K 3 >> v. Archer-Daniels-Midland Co., No. /Pg 16 0 R /Pg 45 0 R disqualify opposing counsel, the present client of the attorney who is the target of the motion,6 and third parties. /Rotate 0 << /K [322 0 R 324 0 R] /Tabs /S /S /P >> endobj /Parent 7 0 R /Resources 399 0 R /P 508 0 R 363 0 obj << /Annots [] /CropBox [0 0 612 792] /Rotate 0 endobj You have to fill out at least 2 forms, maybe more, to file your opposition. /P 292 0 R /Contents [392 0 R 393 0 R 394 0 R] /CropBox [0 0 612 792] Attorneys should not assume that possession of mere playbook knowledge precludes disqualification. endobj 31 [177 0 R 178 0 R 179 0 R] As the Colorado Supreme Court has noted, [v]iolation of an ethical rule, in itself, is neither a necessary nor a sufficient condition for disqualification, although there typically must be evidence of a violation or potential violation of attorney ethical proscriptions, such as those centered on the duties of loyalty and fairness or those intended to protect the integrity of the process. /Pg 18 0 R /P 506 0 R /K 0 Brown v. Encompass Ins. << /CropBox [0 0 612 792] /P 12 0 R /Tabs /S /S /P endobj endobj (a) An attorney may withdraw from a case, without leave of court where the withdrawing attorney has complied with all outstanding orders of the court and either files a notice of withdrawal where there is active co-counsel for the party represented by the withdrawing attorney, or files a substitution of counsel, signed by both the withdrawing and /Pg 26 0 R /Pg 26 0 R /Lang (EN-US) /P 508 0 R Dec. 10, 2014) (order disqualifying Jones Day), assets.law360news.com/ 0606000/606910/Celgard-LGC%20Order%20disqualifying%20 Jones%20Day.pdf. /Count 5 /P 12 0 R /P 12 0 R << 216 0 obj /K 2 /K 23 /K 16 79 0 obj endobj Increasingly, courts nationwide have recognized and accepted timely, effective ethics screens as a positive factor for permitting an attorney to continue the representation, although sometimes a screen is not enough to avoid the ramifications of an imputed conflict.12 Nonetheless, if the attorneys choose to employ a screen, it is important that it be erected before the involvement of the conflicted attorney in the new representation.13. /S /TOCI /S /H3 /K 16 endobj << >> /P 12 0 R /DropCap /Figure >> 2 0 obj /K 0 218 0 obj SHARP The United States, through the undersigned attorney, hereby responds to the defendant's Motion to Disqualify Prosecutors Mark R. Rosman and Karen J. /P 163 0 R /P 12 0 R >> /K [38 293 0 R 40] /Contents [479 0 R 480 0 R 481 0 R] /S /P 36 0 obj /K 0 252 0 obj /Resources 383 0 R /K 1 >> /Pg 23 0 R /Pg 46 0 R << 150 0 obj /Pg 16 0 R /Type /Page /S /P /Pg 45 0 R endobj 98 0 obj /Type /Page /K 2 endobj h[o\{ C@9\`d-X" ?[]&5>fR*UVSO?>|/qnou':._^:WZ.Z.Fw7w/>{_?xw?>G}N/_>}}z>xVp~/zOy_}xwMQm|_}{}?^~'v>'_]/Fkum-i^iz]:JZ_^_^_^_^_^_Y_Y_Y_Yu|]u|}u_5wuRWmVmVmV:C:C:P:~ /]2Vcu9Vcu9Vcu9.X][oW2WWsu5WWs\>rt=9u8Zk[s~VWZNNNNNNiuuu~m^|])^)^)^yuNNNNZuu&?:wmO]$uMuM7~vz?u=uHs[P;?D[R;of}f[oCchO\o^=7o?]N+B/r^No~{>#n?'_~xp@x."Zyc4k4&omcVmnX:5oM[iKfz&lrQ,eM,~e? endobj /Parent 11 0 R 108 0 obj /Annots []